lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 11:12:11 -0800
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] f2fs: add a kernel thread to issue discard commands
 asynchronously

On 01/13, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 02:44:06PM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch adds a kernel thread to issue discard commands.
> > It proposes three states, D_PREP, D_SUBMIT, and D_DONE to identify current
> > bio status.
> 
> Why?  Instead of creating the complexity of a thread you should look
> into issuing the discard bios asynchronously, which should help to
> simplify a lot of the discard logic in f2fs.

Previously, I've done to issue discard bios asynchronously. But the problem that
I've got is that was not enough. When testing nvme SSD with noop IO scheduler,
submit_bio() was blocked at every 8 async discard bios, resulting in very slow
checkpoint process which blocks most of other FS operations.

Thanks,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ