lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2017 00:30:08 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com>
Cc:     Shrirang Bagul <shrirang.bagul@...onical.com>,
        "alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Oder Chiou <oder_chiou@...ltek.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ASoC: rt5660: Add ACPI support

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Bard Liao <bardliao@...ltek.com> wrote:
>> +static const struct acpi_gpio_mapping byt_rt5660_gpios[] = {
>> +     { "audio-wake-intr-gpios", &audio_wake_intr_gpio, 1 },
>> +     { "lineout-mute-gpios", &lineout_mute_gpio, 1 },
>> +     { NULL },
>> +};
>> +
>
> I am thinking if it is more suitable to move the gpio params to
> machine driver? They are not codec's gpios and are only used
> by machine driver.

Generally speaking those properties should come per ACPI ID. So, they
should share the same module which has MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ...)
defined.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ