linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/10] net: dsa: Add support for platform data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:37:51 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "moderated list:ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/10] net: dsa: Add support for platform data

On 01/13/2017 06:04 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> index cd91070b5467..d326fc4afad7 100644
>> --- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
>> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
>> @@ -81,17 +81,23 @@ static void dsa_dst_del_ds(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
>>  
>>  static bool dsa_port_is_valid(struct dsa_port *port)
>>  {
>> -	return !!port->dn;
>> +	return !!(port->dn || port->name);
>>  }
>   
> Does this clash with Viviens recent change to make names optional and
> have the kernel assign it?

So there were two ways to look at this, one was that could check here
that ds->pd is assigned and port->name is assigned, which means that
platform data has to provide valid port name. We can also eliminate this
check entirely because we now support NULL names just fines.

> 
> I suppose you could use an name of "eth%d"? Is it worth adding a
> comment to the platform data structure?

Humm, that could be done, maybe for simplicity we can just let
net/dsa/dsa2.c assign names either based on what platform data provided,
or by falling back to eth%d.

Thanks!
-- 
Florian