linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/20] lockdep: Make RCU suspicious-access splats use pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1484385201-22227-2-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2017 01:13:03 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
        bobby.prani@...il.com,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/20] lockdep: Make RCU suspicious-access splats use pr_err

This commit switches RCU suspicious-access splats use pr_err()
instead of the current INFO printk()s.  This change makes it easier
to automatically classify splats.

Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 7c38f8f3d97b..844cd04bb453 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -4412,13 +4412,13 @@ void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s)
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY */
 	/* Note: the following can be executed concurrently, so be careful. */
 	printk("\n");
-	printk("===============================\n");
-	printk("[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]\n");
+	pr_err("===============================\n");
+	pr_err("suspicious RCU usage. ]\n");
 	print_kernel_ident();
-	printk("-------------------------------\n");
-	printk("%s:%d %s!\n", file, line, s);
-	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
-	printk("\n%srcu_scheduler_active = %d, debug_locks = %d\n",
+	pr_err("-------------------------------\n");
+	pr_err("%s:%d %s!\n", file, line, s);
+	pr_err("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
+	pr_err("\n%srcu_scheduler_active = %d, debug_locks = %d\n",
 	       !rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online()
 			? "RCU used illegally from offline CPU!\n"
 			: !rcu_is_watching()
-- 
2.5.2