linux-kernel - [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Push rq lock pin/unpin into idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-46f69fa33712ad12ccaa723e46ed5929ee93589b@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:41:52 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Matt Fleming <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com, yuyang.du@...el.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, pmladek@...e.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wanpeng.li@...mail.com,
        riel@...hat.com, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com, luca.abeni@...tn.it,
        fweisbec@...il.com, byungchul.park@....com,
        matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, jack@...e.cz, peterz@...radead.org,
        hpa@...or.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, mingo@...nel.org,
        efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Push rq lock pin/unpin into
 idle_balance()

Commit-ID:  46f69fa33712ad12ccaa723e46ed5929ee93589b
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/46f69fa33712ad12ccaa723e46ed5929ee93589b
Author:     Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
AuthorDate: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 14:38:12 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:29:32 +0100

sched/fair: Push rq lock pin/unpin into idle_balance()

Future patches will emit warnings if rq_clock() is called before
update_rq_clock() inside a rq_pin_lock()/rq_unpin_lock() pair.

Since there is only one caller of idle_balance() we can push the
unpin/repin there.

Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Cc: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160921133813.31976-7-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 4904412..faf80e1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3424,7 +3424,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cfs_rq_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	return cfs_rq->avg.load_avg;
 }
 
-static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq);
+static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf);
 
 #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
 
@@ -3453,7 +3453,7 @@ attach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) {}
 static inline void
 detach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) {}
 
-static inline int idle_balance(struct rq *rq)
+static inline int idle_balance(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -6320,15 +6320,8 @@ simple:
 	return p;
 
 idle:
-	/*
-	 * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being picked
-	 * for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still disabled avoiding
-	 * further scheduler activity on it and we're being very careful to
-	 * re-start the picking loop.
-	 */
-	rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
-	new_tasks = idle_balance(rq);
-	rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
+	new_tasks = idle_balance(rq, rf);
+
 	/*
 	 * Because idle_balance() releases (and re-acquires) rq->lock, it is
 	 * possible for any higher priority task to appear. In that case we
@@ -8297,7 +8290,7 @@ update_next_balance(struct sched_domain *sd, unsigned long *next_balance)
  * idle_balance is called by schedule() if this_cpu is about to become
  * idle. Attempts to pull tasks from other CPUs.
  */
-static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
+static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
 {
 	unsigned long next_balance = jiffies + HZ;
 	int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu;
@@ -8311,6 +8304,14 @@ static int idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq)
 	 */
 	this_rq->idle_stamp = rq_clock(this_rq);
 
+	/*
+	 * This is OK, because current is on_cpu, which avoids it being picked
+	 * for load-balance and preemption/IRQs are still disabled avoiding
+	 * further scheduler activity on it and we're being very careful to
+	 * re-start the picking loop.
+	 */
+	rq_unpin_lock(this_rq, rf);
+
 	if (this_rq->avg_idle < sysctl_sched_migration_cost ||
 	    !this_rq->rd->overload) {
 		rcu_read_lock();
@@ -8388,6 +8389,8 @@ out:
 	if (pulled_task)
 		this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
 
+	rq_repin_lock(this_rq, rf);
+
 	return pulled_task;
 }