[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-b8fd8423697b9ec729c5bb91737faad84ae19985@git.kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 04:48:52 -0800
From: tip-bot for Dietmar Eggemann <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, dietmar.eggemann@....com, pjt@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, efault@....de, samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org,
mingo@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:sched/core] sched/fair: Explain why MIN_SHARES isn't scaled in
calc_cfs_shares()
Commit-ID: b8fd8423697b9ec729c5bb91737faad84ae19985
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b8fd8423697b9ec729c5bb91737faad84ae19985
Author: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 11:29:47 +0000
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 11:30:02 +0100
sched/fair: Explain why MIN_SHARES isn't scaled in calc_cfs_shares()
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e9a4d858-bcf3-36b9-e3a9-449953e34569@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 2b866a2..274c747 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2657,6 +2657,18 @@ static long calc_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_group *tg)
if (tg_weight)
shares /= tg_weight;
+ /*
+ * MIN_SHARES has to be unscaled here to support per-CPU partitioning
+ * of a group with small tg->shares value. It is a floor value which is
+ * assigned as a minimum load.weight to the sched_entity representing
+ * the group on a CPU.
+ *
+ * E.g. on 64-bit for a group with tg->shares of scale_load(15)=15*1024
+ * on an 8-core system with 8 tasks each runnable on one CPU shares has
+ * to be 15*1024*1/8=1920 instead of scale_load(MIN_SHARES)=2*1024. In
+ * case no task is runnable on a CPU MIN_SHARES=2 should be returned
+ * instead of 0.
+ */
if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
shares = MIN_SHARES;
if (shares > tg->shares)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists