[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170114183801.GA27644@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:38:01 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kartikey Singh <dr.kartikeynrc@...il.com>
Cc: insafonov@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: staging: rtl8188eu: include: wifi: Unnecessary
do-while removed from macro
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:53:36PM +0530, Kartikey Singh wrote:
> do while loop removed from single statement macro
>
> Signed-off-by: Kartikey Singh <dr.kartikeynrc@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h
> index 9e08e68..57db709 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h
> @@ -481,9 +481,7 @@ static inline int IsFrameTypeCtrl(unsigned char *pframe)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> #define SetOrderBit(pbuf) \
> - do { \
> - *(unsigned short *)(pbuf) |= cpu_to_le16(_ORDER_); \
> - } while (0)
> + (*(unsigned short *)(pbuf) |= cpu_to_le16(_ORDER_))
This macro is never used, so it could just be removed, right?
> #define GetOrderBit(pbuf) \
> (((*(unsigned short *)(pbuf)) & le16_to_cpu(_ORDER_)) != 0)
Same with that one. Care to do that type of fixup instead please?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists