linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1484384085-19444-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Sat, 14 Jan 2017 00:54:45 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
        bobby.prani@...il.com,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcu: Adjust FQS offline checks for exact online-CPU detection

Commit 7ec99de36f40 ("rcu: Provide exact CPU-online tracking for RCU"),
as its title suggests, got rid of RCU's remaining CPU-hotplug timing
guesswork.  This commit therefore removes the one-jiffy kludge that was
used to paper over this guesswork.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 17 ++---------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c920ed3e158c..ed65b1fc8eef 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1280,21 +1280,8 @@ static int rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(struct rcu_data *rdp,
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * Check for the CPU being offline, but only if the grace period
-	 * is old enough.  We don't need to worry about the CPU changing
-	 * state: If we see it offline even once, it has been through a
-	 * quiescent state.
-	 *
-	 * The reason for insisting that the grace period be at least
-	 * one jiffy old is that CPUs that are not quite online and that
-	 * have just gone offline can still execute RCU read-side critical
-	 * sections.
-	 */
-	if (ULONG_CMP_GE(rdp->rsp->gp_start + 2, jiffies))
-		return 0;  /* Grace period is not old enough. */
-	barrier();
-	if (cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu)) {
+	/* Check for the CPU being offline. */
+	if (!(rdp->grpmask & rcu_rnp_online_cpus(rnp))) {
 		trace_rcu_fqs(rdp->rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, rdp->cpu, TPS("ofl"));
 		rdp->offline_fqs++;
 		return 1;
-- 
2.5.2