[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170115094058.GB28621@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 10:40:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com,
will.deacon@....com, boqun.feng@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/3] srcu: Force full grace-period ordering
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > [sounds of rummaging around in the Git tree]
> >
> > I found this commit of yours from ancient history (more than a year ago!):
> >
> > commit 12d560f4ea87030667438a169912380be00cea4b
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date: Tue Jul 14 18:35:23 2015 -0700
> >
> > rcu,locking: Privatize smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()
> >
> > RCU is the only thing that uses smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), and is
> > likely the only thing that ever will use it, so this commit makes this
> > macro private to RCU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: "linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
> >
> > So I concur and I'm fine with your patch - or with the status quo code as well.
>
> I already have the patch queued, so how about I keep it if I get an ack
> from the powerpc guys and drop it otherwise?
Yeah, sounds good! Your patch made me look up 'RelAcq' so it has documentation
value as well ;-)
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists