linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/20] lockdep: Make RCU suspicious-access splats use pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 15 Jan 2017 23:53:02 -0800
From:   Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/20] lockdep: Make RCU suspicious-access
 splats use pr_err

On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 01:13:03AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This commit switches RCU suspicious-access splats use pr_err()
> instead of the current INFO printk()s.  This change makes it easier
> to automatically classify splats.
> 
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

One comment below.

>  kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 12 ++++++------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 7c38f8f3d97b..844cd04bb453 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -4412,13 +4412,13 @@ void lockdep_rcu_suspicious(const char *file, const int line, const char *s)
>  #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY */
>  	/* Note: the following can be executed concurrently, so be careful. */
>  	printk("\n");
> -	printk("===============================\n");
> -	printk("[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]\n");
> +	pr_err("===============================\n");
> +	pr_err("suspicious RCU usage. ]\n");

This message change seems unrelated, and potentially unintentional.

>  	print_kernel_ident();
> -	printk("-------------------------------\n");
> -	printk("%s:%d %s!\n", file, line, s);
> -	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
> -	printk("\n%srcu_scheduler_active = %d, debug_locks = %d\n",
> +	pr_err("-------------------------------\n");
> +	pr_err("%s:%d %s!\n", file, line, s);
> +	pr_err("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
> +	pr_err("\n%srcu_scheduler_active = %d, debug_locks = %d\n",
>  	       !rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online()
>  			? "RCU used illegally from offline CPU!\n"
>  			: !rcu_is_watching()
> -- 
> 2.5.2
>