linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: fix checkpatch unsigned warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:50:36 +0100
From:   Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To:     Roman Sommer <roman.sommer@....de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...cs.fau.de, Rui Miguel Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Bewermeyer <christian.bewermeyer@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: fix checkpatch unsigned warnings

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 09:54:51PM +0100, Roman Sommer wrote:
> Fix checkpatch warnings for parameter type unsigned in greybus.
> Note that this patch does not fix all checkpatch warnings for the
> affected files.

Thanks for the update. In the future, make sure to include a patch
revision in the Subject (e.g. "[PATCH v3] staging: ...") and a changelog
below the cut-off line ("---").

Funny that checkpatch warns about mentioning checkpatch in the Subject
line. Good thing ignoring checkpatch selectively is perfectly fine.

> Signed-off-by: Christian Bewermeyer <christian.bewermeyer@....de>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Sommer <roman.sommer@....de>

Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>

Thanks,
Johan