[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701161456250.3877@nanos>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:59:11 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
cc: vikas.shivappa@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, ravi.v.shankar@...el.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, h.peter.anvin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] x86/intel_rdt/mba: Memory b/w allocation feature
detect
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> Detect MBA feature if CPUID.(EAX=10H, ECX=0):EBX.L2[bit 3] = 1.
> Add supporting data structures to detect feature details which is done
> in later patch using CPUID with EAX=10H, ECX= 3.
So why is the $subject of this patch claiming that it provides the feature
detection?
> -/* CPUID.(EAX=10H, ECX=ResID=1).EDX */
> +/* CPUID.(EAX=10H, ECX=ResID=3).EAX */
> +union cpuid_0x10_3_eax {
> + struct {
> + unsigned int max_delay:12;
> + } split;
And the point of this struct is?
> + unsigned int full;
> +};
> + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MBA)) {
> + ret = true;
> + }
Pointless brackets.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists