lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <abb2e58f-eaa9-1d80-17c0-651520548abb@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:22:03 -0600
From:   "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>
To:     Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>
CC:     <jic23@...nel.org>, <knaack.h@....de>, <lars@...afoo.de>,
        <pmeerw@...erw.net>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: health: afe4403: retrieve a valid iio_dev in
 suspend/resume

On 01/16/2017 12:10 PM, Alison Schofield wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:38:27AM -0600, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
>> On 01/14/2017 09:51 PM, Alison Schofield wrote:
>>> The suspend/resume functions were using dev_to_iio_dev() to get
>>> the iio_dev. That only works on IIO dev's.  Replace it with spi
>>> functions to get the correct iio_dev.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <amsfield22@...il.com>
>>
>> Was this found with an automated tool? If not, it might be nice to have
>> a Coccinelle style check for this. Anyway for this and the afe4404
>> version patch:
>>
>> Acked-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@...com>
>>
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> Just caught my eye while looking at these drivers for another reason:
> they popped up in a cocci scan looking for drivers with regmap and dev
> struct in global data. The dev struct may be redundant since it
> can be retrieved from regmap.  I'm going to look at that a bit further
> and send a patch if appropriate.
> 

I have seen these patches before, and I always NACK them when I can. My
stance is that just because we can find creative ways to recover
information doesn't mean we should. It doesn't and anything and it is
much more clear to me to just keep a copy of *dev to reference when
needed, rather than some round-about method of fetching it through other
entities.

> Back to dev_to_iio_dev...it's a case of history repeating itself, but
> not so often anymore.  I grep'd one more that I'll patch.  So, although
> it appears close to extinction, a cocci check would be great.  It would
> be even more valuble if worked with a more general check of the IIO
> conversion/naming functions that are ripe for misuse.
> 

I'm not a huge fan of all these macro tricks to fetch types for this
reason here, we lose visibility into the containing types. Like here we
have a function (dev_to_iio_dev) that goes from dev to iio_dev with no
real compile time way to know if it is the *right* dev type...

> I'll propose this as an intern task.
> 
> If anyone has read this far and wants to chime in with their favorite
> misused funcs to add to the todo list...please do.
> 
> thanks,
> alisons
> 
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/iio/health/afe4403.c | 4 ++--
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/health/afe4403.c b/drivers/iio/health/afe4403.c
>>> index 9a08146..6bb23a4 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/health/afe4403.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/health/afe4403.c
>>> @@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, afe4403_of_match);
>>>  
>>>  static int __maybe_unused afe4403_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>  {
>>> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
>>> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(to_spi_device(dev));
>>>  	struct afe4403_data *afe = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>  	int ret;
>>>  
>>> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused afe4403_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>  
>>>  static int __maybe_unused afe4403_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>  {
>>> -	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_to_iio_dev(dev);
>>> +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(to_spi_device(dev));
>>>  	struct afe4403_data *afe = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>  	int ret;
>>>  
>>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ