[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170116191641.GA11718@Red>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:16:41 +0100
From: Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/13] arm64: allwinner: a64: Add MMC nodes
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:56:58PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
>
> The A64 has 3 MMC controllers, one of them being especially targeted to
> eMMC. Among other things, it has a data strobe signal and a 8 bits data
> width.
>
> The two other are more usual controllers that will have a 4 bits width at
> most and no data strobe signal, which limits it to more usual SD or MMC
> peripherals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> index 99b6bb1e141c..143e9706438f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi
> @@ -299,6 +299,45 @@
> #size-cells = <0>;
> };
>
> + mmc0: mmc@...f000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> + reg = <0x01c0f000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC0>, <&ccu CLK_MMC0>;
> + clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC0>;
> + reset-names = "ahb";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 60 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + mmc1: mmc@...0000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-mmc";
> + reg = <0x01c10000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC1>, <&ccu CLK_MMC1>;
> + clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC1>;
> + reset-names = "ahb";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 61 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + mmc2: mmc@...1000 {
> + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-emmc";
> + reg = <0x01c11000 0x1000>;
> + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_MMC2>, <&ccu CLK_MMC2>;
> + clock-names = "ahb", "mmc";
> + resets = <&ccu RST_BUS_MMC2>;
> + reset-names = "ahb";
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 62 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> gic: interrupt-controller@...1000 {
> compatible = "arm,gic-400";
> reg = <0x01c81000 0x1000>,
Hello
It seems that mmc node is after i2c@...b400 so not in address order.
Regards
Corentin Labbe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists