linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALAqxLX89PMhSTZnDEoBMngTsfkLs95S5KXg5t4sMCOxkPTbnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:23:44 -0800
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
        Vardan Mikayelyan <mvardan@...opsys.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Felipe Balbi
<felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> writes:
>> I just wanted to re-send my current queue of patches for dwc2
>> controller on the HiKey board, as my last patchset ended up
>> colliding with a number of changes that landed in the 4.10-rc
>> merge window.
>>
>> I've fixed things up and validated these against HiKey. I also
>> made a small change to one of the patches as suggested by Vardan.
>>
>> This does exclude my patchset[1] to add extcon support to dwc2,
>> which John Youn suspects a pending rework of the dwc2 fifo init
>> logic might make unnecssary (however, no such changes appeared
>> to have landed in 4.10-rc, so I'm still using that patchset in
>> my testing).
>>
>> I'm also out for the holidays after today, and while I suspect
>> others are likely going to be out as well, I figured I'd send
>> these out for a chance at review, rather then sit on them for
>> two weeks. I'll resend after the new year addressing any
>> feedback I do get though.
>>
>> Feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>
> John Y, any comments?

So from this JohnY submitted one patch for 4.10-rc (which hasn't yet
landed) and suggested I re-spin the other 4 on top of his for-next
branch. However, that patchset you said doesn't apply to your tree.

Its not really clear who's tree I should be targeting here?

thanks
-john