lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 22:46:22 +0100 (CET)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, peppe.cavallaro@...com,
        Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] stmmac: indent an if statement



On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:19:24PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:14:38PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:46:32 +0300
> > >
> > > > The break statement should be indented one more tab.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > >
> > > Applied, but like Julia I think we might have a missing of_node_put()
> > > here.
> >
> > Of course, sorry for dropping the ball on this.  I'll send a patch for
> > that.
> >
>
> Actually, I've looked at it some more and I think this function is OK.
> We're supposed to do an of_node_put() later...  I can't find where that
> happens, but presumably that's because I don't know stmmac well.  This
> code here, though, is fine.

Why do you think it is fine?  Does anyone in the calling context know
which child would have caused the break?  An extra put is only needed on
that one.  Is there a guarantee that the break is always taken?

julia

Powered by blists - more mailing lists