[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170117074140.GA19328@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 08:41:40 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: headers: potential UAPI headers
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 09:28:30PM +0000, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:06:47PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
> > > Not for landing. This is the purposed UAPI headers
> > > with the removal of unlikely and debugging macros.
> > > This is just for feedback to see if this is acceptable
> > > for the upstream client.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
> > > ---
> > > .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_fid.h | 353 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > .../lustre/lustre/include/lustre/lustre_ostid.h | 233 ++++++++++++++
> >
> > Can you make a lustre "uapi" directory so we can see which files you
> > really want to be UAPI and which you don't as time goes on?
>
> Where do you want them placed? In uapi/linux/lustre or uapi/lustre. Does
> it matter to you? The below was to forth coming UAPI headers which from
> your response you seem okay with in general.
How many .h files are there going to be? It's just a single filesystem,
shouldn't you just need a single file? If so, how about
drivers/staging/lustre/include/uapi/lustre.h
?
If you really need multiple .h files, put them all in the same uapi/
directory with a lustre_ prefix, you don't need a whole subdir just for
yourself, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists