[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c8ed170-ced9-aa6a-25e0-47cdc6d66eb2@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:13:09 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@...il.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: getting oom/stalls for ltp test cpuset01 with latest/4.9 kernel
On 01/16/2017 02:22 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>>
>>> no_zone:
>>> --
>>> 2.11.0
>>>
>>
>> this patch did not fix the issue.
>> issue still exists!
>
> Hmm, that's unfortunate.
>
>> i did bisect and this test passes in 4.4,4.5 and 4.6
>> test failing since 4.7-rc1
>
> 4.7 would match the commit I was trying to fix. But I don't see other
> problems now. Could you bisect to a single commit then, to be sure? Thanks.
Ah, nevermind, I can reproduce the issue easily. After some more poking
I now think the bisect would lead to the OOM rework, but it would be a
red herring. Seems like this is an interaction between bind mempolicy
and cpuset and I see several potential bugs in that area. Which also
means there's a non-null nodemask and thus the code in the commit I
originally suspected (replacing NULL nodemask with cpuset's
mems_allowed) doesn't trigger at all here.
Thanks,
Vlastimil
>> thanks
>> Ganapat
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists