[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170117083351.jy7jsdpi2zvufq5q@lukather>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:33:51 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask@...melder.dk>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans De Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Dropping device tree pinmux nodes for GPIO usage (Was: [PATCH
3/5] arm64: dts: sun50i: add MMC nodes)
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 04:59:32PM +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:52:12AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com> wrote:
> > > +
> > > + mmc0_default_cd_pin: mmc0_cd_pin@0 {
> > > + pins = "PF6";
> > > + function = "gpio_in";
> > > + bias-pull-up;
> > > + };
> >
> > We are starting to drop pinmux nodes for gpio usage.
>
> How do we get the equivalent of bias-pull-up/down and drive-strength if we
> run across a pin that needs it?
Hmm, that's actually a very good question...
For those cases, leave the pinctrl node for now, we'll deal with that
in due time
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists