Message-ID: <8773427e-34d4-7880-e027-4e9330f73a3a@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 16:43:00 +0800
From:   Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>
To:     Eric Ren <zren@...e.com>, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mfasheh@...sity.com, jlbec@...lplan.org,
        ghe@...e.com, junxiao.bi@...cle.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
        hch@....de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ocfs2/dlmglue: prepare tracking logic to avoid
 recursive cluster lock

On 17/1/17 15:55, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 01/17/2017 03:39 PM, Joseph Qi wrote:
>>
>> On 17/1/17 14:30, Eric Ren wrote:
>>> We are in the situation that we have to avoid recursive cluster 
>>> locking,
>>> but there is no way to check if a cluster lock has been taken by a
>>> precess already.
>>>
>>> Mostly, we can avoid recursive locking by writing code carefully.
>>> However, we found that it's very hard to handle the routines that
>>> are invoked directly by vfs code. For instance:
>>>
>>> const struct inode_operations ocfs2_file_iops = {
>>>      .permission     = ocfs2_permission,
>>>      .get_acl        = ocfs2_iop_get_acl,
>>>      .set_acl        = ocfs2_iop_set_acl,
>>> };
>>>
>>> Both ocfs2_permission() and ocfs2_iop_get_acl() call 
>>> ocfs2_inode_lock(PR):
>>> do_sys_open
>>>   may_open
>>>    inode_permission
>>>     ocfs2_permission
>>>      ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== first time
>>>       generic_permission
>>>        get_acl
>>>         ocfs2_iop_get_acl
>>>     ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== recursive one
>>>
>>> A deadlock will occur if a remote EX request comes in between two
>>> of ocfs2_inode_lock(). Briefly describe how the deadlock is formed:
>>>
>>> On one hand, OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED flag of this lockres is set in
>>> BAST(ocfs2_generic_handle_bast) when downconvert is started
>>> on behalf of the remote EX lock request. Another hand, the recursive
>>> cluster lock (the second one) will be blocked in in 
>>> __ocfs2_cluster_lock()
>>> because of OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED. But, the downconvert never complete, 
>>> why?
>>> because there is no chance for the first cluster lock on this node 
>>> to be
>>> unlocked - we block ourselves in the code path.
>>>
>>> The idea to fix this issue is mostly taken from gfs2 code.
>>> 1. introduce a new field: struct ocfs2_lock_res.l_holders, to
>>> keep track of the processes' pid  who has taken the cluster lock
>>> of this lock resource;
>>> 2. introduce a new flag for ocfs2_inode_lock_full: 
>>> OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>> it means just getting back disk inode bh for us if we've got cluster 
>>> lock.
>>> 3. export a helper: ocfs2_is_locked_by_me() is used to check if we
>>> have got the cluster lock in the upper code path.
>>>
>>> The tracking logic should be used by some of the ocfs2 vfs's callbacks,
>>> to solve the recursive locking issue cuased by the fact that vfs 
>>> routines
>>> can call into each other.
>>>
>>> The performance penalty of processing the holder list should only be 
>>> seen
>>> at a few cases where the tracking logic is used, such as get/set acl.
>>>
>>> You may ask what if the first time we got a PR lock, and the second 
>>> time
>>> we want a EX lock? fortunately, this case never happens in the real 
>>> world,
>>> as far as I can see, including permission check, 
>>> (get|set)_(acl|attr), and
>>> the gfs2 code also do so.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Let ocfs2_is_locked_by_me() just return true/false to indicate if the
>>> process gets the cluster lock - suggested by: Joseph Qi 
>>> <jiangqi903@...il.com>
>>> and Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>.
>>>
>>> - Change "struct ocfs2_holder" to a more meaningful name 
>>> "ocfs2_lock_holder",
>>> suggested by: Junxiao Bi.
>>>
>>> - Do not inline functions whose bodies are not in scope, changed by:
>>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>.
>>>
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> - Wrap the tracking logic code of recursive locking into functions,
>>> ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker() and ocfs2_inode_unlock_tracker(),
>>> suggested by: Junxiao Bi.
>>>
>>> [sfr@...b.auug.org.au remove some inlines]
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <zren@...e.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 105 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>   fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h |  18 +++++++++
>>>   fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h   |   1 +
>>>   3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>> index 77d1632..c75b9e9 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
>>> @@ -532,6 +532,7 @@ void ocfs2_lock_res_init_once(struct 
>>> ocfs2_lock_res *res)
>>>       init_waitqueue_head(&res->l_event);
>>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&res->l_blocked_list);
>>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&res->l_mask_waiters);
>>> +    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&res->l_holders);
>>>   }
>>>     void ocfs2_inode_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res,
>>> @@ -749,6 +750,50 @@ void ocfs2_lock_res_free(struct ocfs2_lock_res 
>>> *res)
>>>       res->l_flags = 0UL;
>>>   }
>>>   +/*
>>> + * Keep a list of processes who have interest in a lockres.
>>> + * Note: this is now only uesed for check recursive cluster locking.
>>> + */
>>> +static inline void ocfs2_add_holder(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>> +                   struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh)
>>> +{
>>> +    INIT_LIST_HEAD(&oh->oh_list);
>>> +    oh->oh_owner_pid =  get_pid(task_pid(current));
>> Trim the redundant space here.
>
> You mean the blank line here? If so, I am OK to make the change. But,
> I'm little worried about people may feel annoyed if I send the v4 
> patch set,
> hah.
>
oh->oh_owner_pid =  get_pid(task_pid(current));
                                  ^
Here you put one more space.
You can check your patches using checkpatch.pl then decide if need send
a new version.

Thanks,
Joseph
>> Others look good to me.
>> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@...il.com>
>
> Thanks for your guys' review!
> Eric
>>> +
>>> +    spin_lock(&lockres->l_lock);
>>> +    list_add_tail(&oh->oh_list, &lockres->l_holders);
>>> +    spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline void ocfs2_remove_holder(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>> +                       struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh)
>>> +{
>>> +    spin_lock(&lockres->l_lock);
>>> +    list_del(&oh->oh_list);
>>> +    spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
>>> +
>>> +    put_pid(oh->oh_owner_pid);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline int ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(struct ocfs2_lock_res 
>>> *lockres)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh;
>>> +    struct pid *pid;
>>> +
>>> +    /* look in the list of holders for one with the current task as 
>>> owner */
>>> +    spin_lock(&lockres->l_lock);
>>> +    pid = task_pid(current);
>>> +    list_for_each_entry(oh, &lockres->l_holders, oh_list) {
>>> +        if (oh->oh_owner_pid == pid) {
>>> +            spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
>>> +            return 1;
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>> +    spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
>>> +
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   static inline void ocfs2_inc_holders(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
>>>                        int level)
>>>   {
>>> @@ -2333,8 +2378,9 @@ int ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested(struct inode 
>>> *inode,
>>>           goto getbh;
>>>       }
>>>   -    if (ocfs2_mount_local(osb))
>>> -        goto local;
>>> +    if ((arg_flags & OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH) ||
>>> +        ocfs2_mount_local(osb))
>>> +        goto update;
>>>         if (!(arg_flags & OCFS2_META_LOCK_RECOVERY))
>>>           ocfs2_wait_for_recovery(osb);
>>> @@ -2363,7 +2409,7 @@ int ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested(struct inode 
>>> *inode,
>>>       if (!(arg_flags & OCFS2_META_LOCK_RECOVERY))
>>>           ocfs2_wait_for_recovery(osb);
>>>   -local:
>>> +update:
>>>       /*
>>>        * We only see this flag if we're being called from
>>>        * ocfs2_read_locked_inode(). It means we're locking an inode
>>> @@ -2497,6 +2543,59 @@ void ocfs2_inode_unlock(struct inode *inode,
>>>           ocfs2_cluster_unlock(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb), lockres, level);
>>>   }
>>>   +/*
>>> + * This _tracker variantes are introduced to deal with the 
>>> recursive cluster
>>> + * locking issue. The idea is to keep track of a lock holder on the 
>>> stack of
>>> + * the current process. If there's a lock holder on the stack, we 
>>> know the
>>> + * task context is already protected by cluster locking. Currently, 
>>> they're
>>> + * used in some VFS entry routines.
>>> + *
>>> + * return < 0 on error, return == 0 if there's no lock holder on 
>>> the stack
>>> + * before this call, return == 1 if this call would be a recursive 
>>> locking.
>>> + */
>>> +int ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
>>> +                 struct buffer_head **ret_bh,
>>> +                 int ex,
>>> +                 struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh)
>>> +{
>>> +    int status;
>>> +    int arg_flags = 0, has_locked;
>>> +    struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>> +
>>> +    lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>> +    has_locked = ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres);
>>> +    /* Just get buffer head if the cluster lock has been taken */
>>> +    if (has_locked)
>>> +        arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
>>> +
>>> +    if (likely(!has_locked || ret_bh)) {
>>> +        status = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, ret_bh, ex, arg_flags);
>>> +        if (status < 0) {
>>> +            if (status != -ENOENT)
>>> +                mlog_errno(status);
>>> +            return status;
>>> +        }
>>> +    }
>>> +    if (!has_locked)
>>> +        ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, oh);
>>> +
>>> +    return has_locked;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void ocfs2_inode_unlock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
>>> +                int ex,
>>> +                struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh,
>>> +                int had_lock)
>>> +{
>>> +    struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>> +
>>> +    lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
>>> +    if (!had_lock) {
>>> +        ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, oh);
>>> +        ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, ex);
>>> +    }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>   int ocfs2_orphan_scan_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u32 *seqno)
>>>   {
>>>       struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h
>>> index d293a22..a7fc18b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h
>>> @@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ struct ocfs2_orphan_scan_lvb {
>>>       __be32    lvb_os_seqno;
>>>   };
>>>   +struct ocfs2_lock_holder {
>>> +    struct list_head oh_list;
>>> +    struct pid *oh_owner_pid;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>   /* ocfs2_inode_lock_full() 'arg_flags' flags */
>>>   /* don't wait on recovery. */
>>>   #define OCFS2_META_LOCK_RECOVERY    (0x01)
>>> @@ -77,6 +82,8 @@ struct ocfs2_orphan_scan_lvb {
>>>   #define OCFS2_META_LOCK_NOQUEUE        (0x02)
>>>   /* don't block waiting for the downconvert thread, instead return 
>>> -EAGAIN */
>>>   #define OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK        (0x04)
>>> +/* just get back disk inode bh if we've got cluster lock. */
>>> +#define OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH        (0x08)
>>>     /* Locking subclasses of inode cluster lock */
>>>   enum {
>>> @@ -170,4 +177,15 @@ void ocfs2_put_dlm_debug(struct ocfs2_dlm_debug 
>>> *dlm_debug);
>>>     /* To set the locking protocol on module initialization */
>>>   void ocfs2_set_locking_protocol(void);
>>> +
>>> +/* The _tracker pair is used to avoid cluster recursive locking */
>>> +int ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
>>> +                 struct buffer_head **ret_bh,
>>> +                 int ex,
>>> +                 struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh);
>>> +void ocfs2_inode_unlock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
>>> +                int ex,
>>> +                struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh,
>>> +                int had_lock);
>>> +
>>>   #endif    /* DLMGLUE_H */
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>> index 7e5958b..0c39d71 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
>>> @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ struct ocfs2_lock_res {
>>>         struct list_head         l_blocked_list;
>>>       struct list_head         l_mask_waiters;
>>> +    struct list_head     l_holders;
>>>         unsigned long         l_flags;
>>>       char                     l_name[OCFS2_LOCK_ID_MAX_LEN];
>>
>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists