linux-kernel - Re: [05/26] drm/rockchip: dw-mipi-dsi: fix command header writes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:32:30 +0800
From:   Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
To:     John Keeping <john@...anate.com>,
        Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [05/26] drm/rockchip: dw-mipi-dsi: fix command header writes

same as https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9518417/

Tested-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>

On 09/20/2016 01:17 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> In a couple of places here we use "val" for the value that is about to
> be written to a register but then reuse the same variable for the value
> of a status register before we get around to writing it.  Rename the
> value to be written to so that we write the value we intend to and not
> what we have just read from the status register.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> index fac2429b9d6d..03915bf9c97d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> @@ -543,9 +543,10 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_host_detach(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -static int dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 val)
> +static int dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 hdr_val)
>   {
>   	int ret;
> +	u32 val;
>   
>   	ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>   				 val, !(val & GEN_CMD_FULL), 1000,
> @@ -555,7 +556,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi, u32 val)
>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   
> -	dsi_write(dsi, DSI_GEN_HDR, val);
> +	dsi_write(dsi, DSI_GEN_HDR, hdr_val);
>   
>   	ret = readx_poll_timeout(readl, dsi->base + DSI_CMD_PKT_STATUS,
>   				 val, val & (GEN_CMD_EMPTY | GEN_PLD_W_EMPTY),
> @@ -588,8 +589,9 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_long_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
>   {
>   	const u32 *tx_buf = msg->tx_buf;
>   	int len = msg->tx_len, pld_data_bytes = sizeof(*tx_buf), ret;
> -	u32 val = GEN_HDATA(msg->tx_len) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type);
> +	u32 hdr_val = GEN_HDATA(msg->tx_len) | GEN_HTYPE(msg->type);
>   	u32 remainder = 0;
> +	u32 val;
>   
>   	if (msg->tx_len < 3) {
>   		dev_err(dsi->dev, "wrong tx buf length %zu for long write\n",
> @@ -618,7 +620,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_dcs_long_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	return dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(dsi, val);
> +	return dw_mipi_dsi_gen_pkt_hdr_write(dsi, hdr_val);
>   }
>   
>   static ssize_t dw_mipi_dsi_host_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,