lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:07:51 -0800
From:   Jeremy McNicoll <jmcnicol@...hat.com>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     adrian.hunter@...el.com, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        shawn.lin@...k-chips.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        georgi.djakov@...aro.org, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        stummala@...eaurora.org, venkatg@...eaurora.org,
        pramod.gurav@...aro.org, jeremymc@...hat.com, git@...r.de
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv1 0/8] mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide support for
 enhanced strobe

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 12:30:44PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Hi, 
> 
> Resending this patch series, as no one could review it -possibly due to
> holidays during that time.
> 
> This patch series mainly provides enhanced strobe support to sdhci-msm driver
> along with some additions of HW recommended sequence. This has been tested on
> 8996 based internal target & on db410c.
> 
> Patches 1-3 :- Factors out few functions to be re-used again.
> 	       To also simplify large functions and makes it more readable.
> 
> Patches 4-5 :- Few recommendations based on HW prog. guide.
> 
> Patches 6 :- Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning
> 	     so that ->platform_execute_tuning (underlying platform driver) can
> 	     know about HS400 tuning.
> 
> Patch 7 :- Implements an additional step as per HPG for HS400 tuning.
> 
> Patch 8 :- Implements enhanced strobe functionality in sdhci-msm driver.
> 
>

I have included this series in my tree while testing my SDHCI V2 series.

One message did occur which looks new or unfamilar and relatively
harmless,

"sdhci_msm f9824900.mmc: TCXO clk not present (-2) "

Is that something I am missing on my side?  

In anycase,

Tested-by: Jeremy McNicoll <jeremymc@...hat.com>

-jeremy


> Ritesh Harjani (6):
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hc_select_mode
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out function to set/get msm clock rate
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: Factor out sdhci_msm_hs400
>   mmc: sdhci: Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after
>     platform_execute_tuning
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: Make HS400 tuning follow as per recommeneded HW
>     sequence
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: Provide enhanced_strobe mode feature support
> 
> Subhash Jadavani (1):
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: configure CORE_CSR_CDC_DELAY_CFG to recommended value
> 
> Venkat Gopalakrishnan (1):
>   mmc: sdhci-msm: Reset vendor specific func register on probe
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-msm.c | 356 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c     |   6 +-
>  2 files changed, 224 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, 
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ