Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 10:43:17 +0000
From:   Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
To:     Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>
CC:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        "jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcie: ti: Provide patch to force GEN1 PCIe operation


Hi Lukasz,

Às 9:44 PM de 1/16/2017, Lukasz Majewski escreveu:
> Hi Joao,
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Às 10:13 AM de 1/16/2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I escreveu:
>>> + Joao, Jingoo
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday 16 January 2017 03:01 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>>> Hi Kishon,
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Łukasz,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Monday 16 January 2017 12:19 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Kishon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday 15 January 2017 06:49 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>>>>>>> Some devices (due to e.g. bad PCIe signal integrity) require to
>>>>>>>> run with forced GEN1 speed on PCIe bus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch changes the speed explicitly on dra7 based devices
>>>>>>>> when proper device tree attribute is defined for the PCIe
>>>>>>>> controller.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bjorn has already queued a patch to do the same thing
>>>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.kernel.org_cgit_linux_kernel_git_helgaas_pci.git_log_-3Fh-3Dpci_host-2Ddra7xx&d=DwIDaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=zD82T5n4WcL7Ga-NSY2NI7KE75xQ99hN-mW2yX46wQk&s=E8zk1CbKxGH-f3fw_WpXxFU-A8BLkgA8NusCaxk1SvA&e= 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems like Bjorn only modifies CAP registers.
>>>>>
>>>>> The patch also modifies the LNKCTL2 register.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He also needs to change register with 0x080C offset to actually
>>>>>> ( PCIECTRL_PL_WIDTH_SPEED_CTL )
>>>>>
>>>>> This bit is used to initiate speed change (after the link is
>>>>> initialized in GEN1). Resetting the bit (like what you have done
>>>>> here) prevents speed change.
>>>>
>>>> This is strange, but e2e advised me to do things as I did in the
>>>> patch to _force_ GEN1 operation on PCIe2 port [1] (AM5728)
>>>>
>>>> Link:
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__e2e.ti.com_support_arm_sitara-5Farm_f_791_t_566421&d=DwIDaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=zD82T5n4WcL7Ga-NSY2NI7KE75xQ99hN-mW2yX46wQk&s=uXLwglyRYqKpwp1JSxkOWmKpQ2wjfhgofpm8DCfquNw&e= 
>>>>
>>>> Both patches modify 0x5180 007C register to set GEN1 capability
>>>> (PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB)
>>>>
>>>> The problem is with second register (in your patch):
>>>>
>>>> From SPRUHZ6G TRM:
>>>>
>>>> PCIECTRL_EP_DBICS_LNK_CAS_2 (0x5180 00A0)
>>>> - TRGT_LINK_SPEED (Reset 0x1) - "Target Link Speed" - no more
>>>>   description in TRM
>>>>
>>>> It is set to PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB = 0x1, which is the same as
>>>> default /reset value.
>>>
>>> The default value is 0x2 (or else none of the cards would have
>>> enumerated in GEN2)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Could you clarify which way to _force_ PCIe GEN1 operation is
>>>> correct? Mine shows differences in lspci output (as posted in [1]).
>>>
>>> You'll see the difference even with the patch in Bjorn's tree ;-)
>>>
>>> I think these are 2 different approaches to keep the link at GEN1.
>>> Joao or Jingoo, do you have any suggestion here?
>>
>> I studied the Databook,
> 
> Could you reveal which databook do you have in mind? Is that the TRM for
> AM5728?

I checked the Designware PCIe Databook, since it is based on this IP.

> 
>> and both approaches seem to be right,
>> dependently of the Core configuration and setup.
>>
>> The standard manual speed change sequence is:
>> a) Write to PCIE_CAP_TARGET_LINK_SPEED (indicating desired speed)
> 
> Do you mean TRGT_LINK_SPEED @ 0x5180 00A0 ?

Correct.

> 
>> b) Clear "Directed Speed Change"
> 
> CFG_DIRECTED_SPEED_CHANGE @ 0x5180 080C 

Correct.

> 
>> c) Set "Directed Speed Change"
>>
>> If "Directed Speed Change" is set (DEFAULT_GEN2_SPEED_CHANGE is the
>> default value), it will execute LTSSM to initiate speed change to
>> Gen2 or Gen3, after link is started in Gen1, and then the bit is
>> automatically cleared.
> 
> Ok, so with default settings (after reset) we do have Gen1 speed link
> and when we enable LTSSM (with LTSSM_EN bit setting) we negotiate to
> Gen2/Gen3.

Yes, that's the expected behavior. I submited this direct question to R&D and
will have your doubt answered soon.

> 
>>
>> Lukasz is reseting this bit, in order to avoid the LTSSM to be
>> executed, which is correct. 
> 
> So with CFG_DIRECTED_SPEED_CHANGE = 0, when I start LTSSM (with
> LTSSM_EN) the state machine returns immediately and leaves link in the
> Gen1?
> 
> The pci-dra7 driver always sets LTSSM_EN bit to start link negotiation.
> 
>> There is another way to prevent this
>> automatic speed change, which is to set GEN1 speed before link up
>> which might be difficult in some setups, so Kishon's also right.
>>
>> In my opinion Lukasz approach would be the one that might be more
>> universal and more "secure".
> 
> The robustness is the key here since there are some devices, which on
> particular HW must only work with Gen1 speed. When we start LTSSM state
> machine and hence start negotiation to Gen2, not always the result of
> LTSSM is correct and device is properly recognized.
> 
>>
>> Joao
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO the better way is to set the LNKCTL2 to GEN1 instead of
>>>>> hacking the IP register.
>>>>
>>>> From the original patch description:
>>>>
>>>> "Add support to force Root Complex to work in GEN1 mode if so
>>>> desired, but don't force GEN1 mode on any board just yet."
>>>>
>>>> Are there any (floating around) patches allowing forcing GEN1
>>>> operation on any board (I would like to reuse/port them to my
>>>> current solution)?
>>>
>>> For setting to GEN1 mode, "max-link-speed" should be set to 1 in dt
>>> with the patch in Bjorn's tree.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Kishon
>>>
>>
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Lukasz Majewski
> 
> --
> 
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@...x.de
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists