[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADyBb7ugEbFB42PcoJc0J8q4BAzCC5HfC8638sMm-5nzA3zcZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:22:17 +0800
From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@...aro.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Timur Tabi <timur@...eaurora.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
rruigrok@...eaurora.org, "Abdulhamid, Harb" <harba@...eaurora.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>, Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Wei Huang <wei@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
Leo Duran <leo.duran@....com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 10/15] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Refactor
the timer init code to prepare for GTDT
Hi Mark,
On 17 January 2017 at 20:29, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 06:18:12AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
>> Fu Wei wrote:
>> >if (i >= ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES) {
>> > pr_err(FW_BUG "too many frames, ARMv8 spec only allows 8.\n");
>>
>> pr_err(FW_BUG "too many frames, ARMv8 spec only allows %u.\n",
>> ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES);
>
> While I don't see ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES changing, this would be
> nicer to ensure the result obviously matches.
>
> As for wording, I'd perfer:
>
> pr_err(FW_BUG "too many frames, only %u are permitted.\n",
> ARCH_TIMER_MEM_MAX_FRAMES);
OK, will do so.
Thanks!
>
> ... so as to avoid any confusion between spec versions and so on. We can
> reconsider the message if/when that changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists