lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39207e24-a937-e4d8-4b2e-a06b68ea9855@suse.cz>
Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 22:24:28 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc:     Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm, page_alloc: Split buffered_rmqueue

On 01/17/2017 10:07 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 08:20:08PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> I later recalled that we looked at this before and didn't think a reinit
> was necessary because the location of cpuset_current_mems_allowed doesn't
> change so I came back and took another look.  The location doesn't change
> but after the first attempt, we reset ac.nodemask to the given nodemask and
> don't recheck current_mems_allowed if the cpuset changed. The application
> of memory policies versus cpusets is a mess so it'll take time to pick
> apart to see if this is even remotely in the right direction.

Yes, I spent most of last 2 days untangling this, so I'll post at least
some RFC soon.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ