[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e76ccd27-ce3b-d9e3-42c7-80586c34de18@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:53:23 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <rmk@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree
On 01/17/2017 02:49 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/platsmp.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 6996cbb23721 ("ARM: 8641/1: treewide: Replace uses of virt_to_phys with __pa_symbol")
>
> from the arm tree and commit:
>
> 9e634cae7256 ("ARM: ux500: simplify secondary boot")
>
> from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Your resolution looks correct, thanks Stephen!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists