[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170118155824.689a9996@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 15:58:24 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: __mutex_lock_common() unlikely very likely
Chris,
My branch tracer flagged the unlikely in __mutex_lock_common() as
always hit. That's the:
if (use_ww_ctx) {
[...]
if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
return -EALREADY;
}
This is hit 100% of the time, and its coming from the drm logic:
for example:
<stack trace>
=> drm_atomic_get_crtc_state
=> drm_atomic_helper_duplicate_state
=> intel_modeset_init
=> i915_driver_load
=> i915_pci_probe
=> local_pci_probe
=> pci_device_probe
=> driver_probe_device
=> __driver_attach
=> bus_for_each_dev
=> driver_attach
=> bus_add_driver
=> driver_register
=> __pci_register_driver
=> ext4_has_free_clusters
=> do_one_initcall
=> do_init_module
=> load_module
=> SYSC_init_module
=> SyS_init_module
=> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath
This is happening on 3 boxes of mine running normal loads (servers,
email, facebook, etc).
Commit 0422e83d84ae2 says:
Recursive locking for ww_mutexes was originally conceived as an
exception. However, it is heavily used by the DRM atomic modesetting
code. Currently, the recursive deadlock is checked after we have queued
up for a busy-spin and as we never release the lock, we spin until
kicked, whereupon the deadlock is discovered and reported.
Should this be converted to a likely?
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists