[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170118051457.30946-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:14:56 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] perf diff: Fix segfault on perf diff -o N option
The -o/--order option is to select column number to sort a diff result.
It does the job by adding a hpp field at the beginning of the sort list.
But it should not be added to the output field list as it has no
callbacks required by a output field.
During the setup_sorting(), the perf_hpp__setup_output_field() appends
given sort keys to the output field if it's not there already.
Originally it was checked by the fmt->list being non-empty. But commit
3f931f2c4274 changed it to check the ->equal callback. Anyway we don't
need to add the pseudo hpp field to the output field list since it won't
be used for output. So just skip fields if they have no ->color or
->entry callbacks.
Fixes: 3f931f2c4274 ("perf hists: Make hpp setup function generic")
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
tools/perf/ui/hist.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
index 37388397b5bc..4ec79b2f9416 100644
--- a/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/ui/hist.c
@@ -560,6 +560,10 @@ void perf_hpp__setup_output_field(struct perf_hpp_list *list)
perf_hpp_list__for_each_sort_list(list, fmt) {
struct perf_hpp_fmt *pos;
+ /* skip sort-only fields ("sort_compute" in perf diff) */
+ if (!fmt->entry && !fmt->color)
+ continue;
+
perf_hpp_list__for_each_format(list, pos) {
if (fmt_equal(fmt, pos))
goto next;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists