lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:53:17 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gpkulkarni@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] mm, page_alloc: fix check for NULL preferred_zone

On Wed 18-01-17 10:45:33, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 01/18/2017 10:31 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Tue 17-01-17 23:16:07, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > Since commit c33d6c06f60f ("mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in
> > > a zonelist twice") we have a wrong check for NULL preferred_zone, which can
> > > theoretically happen due to concurrent cpuset modification. We check the
> > > zoneref pointer which is never NULL and we should check the zone pointer.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: c33d6c06f60f ("mm, page_alloc: avoid looking up the first zone in a zonelist twice")
> > > Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > > ---
> > >  mm/page_alloc.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > index 34ada718ef47..593a11d8bc6b 100644
> > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > > @@ -3763,7 +3763,7 @@ __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
> > >  	 */
> > >  	ac.preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist(ac.zonelist,
> > >  					ac.high_zoneidx, ac.nodemask);
> > > -	if (!ac.preferred_zoneref) {
> > > +	if (!ac.preferred_zoneref->zone) {
> > 
> > When can the ->zone be NULL?
> 
> Either we get a genuinely screwed nodemask, or there's a concurrent cpuset
> update and nodes in zonelist are ordered in such a way that we see all of
> them as not being available to us in the nodemask/current->mems_alowed, when
> we iterate the zonelist, so we reach the end of zonelist. The zonelists are
> terminated with a zoneref with NULL zone pointer.

Thanks for the clarification.  Please add a big fat comment in
first_zones_zonelist about this potential case.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ