[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20170118104627.162517959@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:46:47 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 38/48] pNFS: Fix race in pnfs_wait_on_layoutreturn
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
commit ee284e35d8c71bf5d4d807eaff6f67a17134b359 upstream.
We must put the task to sleep while holding the inode->i_lock in order
to ensure atomicity with the test for NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN.
Fixes: 500d701f336b ("NFS41: make close wait for layoutreturn")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
@@ -1185,13 +1185,11 @@ bool pnfs_wait_on_layoutreturn(struct in
* i_lock */
spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
lo = nfsi->layout;
- if (lo && test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags))
+ if (lo && test_bit(NFS_LAYOUT_RETURN, &lo->plh_flags)) {
+ rpc_sleep_on(&NFS_SERVER(ino)->roc_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
sleep = true;
+ }
spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
-
- if (sleep)
- rpc_sleep_on(&NFS_SERVER(ino)->roc_rpcwaitq, task, NULL);
-
return sleep;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists