linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 042/120] x86/CPU/AMD: Fix Bulldozer topology

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170118104649.827949669@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:46:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 042/120] x86/CPU/AMD: Fix Bulldozer topology

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

commit a33d331761bc5dd330499ca5ceceb67f0640a8e6 upstream.

The following commit:

  8196dab4fc15 ("x86/cpu: Get rid of compute_unit_id")

... broke the initial strategy for Bulldozer-based cores' topology,
where we consider each thread of a compute unit a standalone core
and not a HT or SMT thread.

Revert to the firmware-supplied core_id numbering and do not make
them thread siblings as we don't consider them for such even if they
technically are, more or less.

Reported-and-tested-by: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Tested-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Fixes: 8196dab4fc15 ("x86/cpu: Get rid of compute_unit_id")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170105092638.5247-1-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c |    9 +--------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
@@ -309,15 +309,8 @@ static void amd_get_topology(struct cpui

 	/* get information required for multi-node processors */
 	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)) {
-		u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;

-		cpuid(0x8000001e, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
-		node_id = ecx & 7;
-
-		/* get compute unit information */
-		smp_num_siblings = ((ebx >> 8) & 3) + 1;
-		c->x86_max_cores /= smp_num_siblings;
-		c->cpu_core_id = ebx & 0xff;
+		node_id = cpuid_ecx(0x8000001e) & 7;

 		/*
 		 * We may have multiple LLCs if L3 caches exist, so check if we