[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x49ziiol5lh.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:01:46 -0500
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, agk@...hat.com, snitzer@...hat.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, shli@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [patch] block: add blktrace C events for bio-based drivers
Hi, Jens,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> writes:
> I like the change, hate the naming. I'd prefer one of two things:
>
> - Add bio_endio_complete() instead. That name sucks too, the
> important part is flipping the __name() to have a trace
> version instead.
ITYM a notrace version. By default, we want tracing for bio_endio. The
only callers that need the inverse of that are in the request-based
path, and there are only 2 of them.
> - Mark the bio as trace completed, and keep the naming. Since
> it's only off the completion path, that can be just marking
> the bi_flags non-atomically.
One issue with this is in generic_make_request_checks, where we can call
bio_endio without having called trace_block_bio_queue (so you could get
a C event with no corresponding Q). To address that, we could make the
flag indicate that trace_block_bio_queue was performed, and clear it in
bio_complete, like so:
if (test_and_clear_bit(BIO_QUEUE_TRACED, &bio->bi_flags))
trace_block_bio_complete(...);
That would solve the problem of duplicate completions, but requires
setting the flag in the submission path and clearing it in the
completion path. I think the former can be done with just a
bio_set_flag (i.e. non-atomic), right? Of course, where to stick that
bio_set_flag call is another bike-shedding discussion waiting to happen
(i.e. does it go in the tracepoint itself?).
Alternatively, we could set the trace_completed flag in the paths where
we end I/O without having done the trace_block_bio_queue, but that seems
way uglier to me.
Can you think of any other options? If we're choosing from the above,
my preference is for adding the bio_endio_notrace(), since it's so much
simpler.
Cheers,
Jeff
Powered by blists - more mailing lists