[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170118151217.GA26808@samfundet.no>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 16:12:17 +0100
From: Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] AVR32: Fine-tuning for two function implementations
Around Wed 18 Jan 2017 14:45:07 +0100 or thereabout, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:40:04 +0100
>
> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
>
> Markus Elfring (3):
> Return directly after a failed access_ok() in setup_rt_frame()
> Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation in setup_rt_frame()
> Return an error code only as a constant in sys_cacheflush()
>
> arch/avr32/kernel/signal.c | 5 ++---
> arch/avr32/mm/cache.c | 21 +++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Ack, I guess it slightly simplifies reading. Will add to linux-avr32 git
tree.
--
mvh
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists