linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 6+/6] platform/x86: dell-wmi-led: fix coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vc3LnFGPjMt8uYQeqHWPqMM-rFzsdLA94C5bJQgq++K6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:06:00 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl>
Cc:     Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Anthony Wong <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6+/6] platform/x86: dell-wmi-led: fix coding style issues

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Michał Kępień <kernel@...pniu.pl> wrote:
> Fix coding style issues in dell-wmi-led which checkpatch complains about
> to make sure the module gets a clean start in the x86 platform driver
> subsystem.

> +       status = wmi_evaluate_method(DELL_LED_BIOS_GUID, 1, 1, &input, &output);
>

You may remove extra line.

>         if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>                 return status;

> -       if (0 == on_eighths)
> +       if (on_eighths == 0)
>                 on_eighths = 1;
>         if (on_eighths > 255)
>                 on_eighths = 255;

> -       if (0 == off_eighths)
> +       if (off_eighths == 0)
>                 off_eighths = 1;
>         if (off_eighths > 255)
>                 off_eighths = 255;

Obviously they both are custom clamp{_t}().

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko