lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:24:29 +0100
From:   Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To:     Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xen: optimize xenbus driver for multiple
 concurrent xenstore accesses

On 18/01/17 21:14, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 01/16/2017 09:15 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> +
>> +static uint32_t xs_request_enter(struct xb_req_data *req)
>> +{
>> +	uint32_t rq_id;
>> +
>> +	req->type = req->msg.type;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock(&xs_state_lock);
>> +	for (;;) {
>> +		if (req->msg.tx_id != 0)
>> +			break;
>> +		if (xs_suspend_active) {
>> +			spin_unlock(&xs_state_lock);
>> +			wait_event(xs_state_enter_wq, xs_suspend_active == 0);
>> +			spin_lock(&xs_state_lock);
>> +			continue;
>> +		}
>> +		if (req->type == XS_TRANSACTION_START)
>> +			xs_state_users++;
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +	xs_state_users++;
>> +	rq_id = xs_request_id++;
>> +	spin_unlock(&xs_state_lock);
>> +
>> +	return rq_id;
>> +}
> 
> I should have noticed this last time but I've been looking at this code
> again and I don't think I understand why you are incrementing count for
> XS_TRANSACTION_START inside the loop.
> 
> In fact, why not just 'while(xs_suspend_active) {}' loop?

That's a valid question.

I'll change it. The reason to have the larger loop body isn't existing
any longer.


Juergen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ