linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 16:18:29 +0800
From:   Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume_latency for each cpu



On 01/17/2017 06:23 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> >  
>> > @@ -376,6 +377,7 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
>> >  
>> >  	per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev;
>> >  	register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
>> > +	dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev, 0);
> This patch should be submitted as the last patch in the latencies constraint
> changes patchset IMO. It is pointless to provide an interface before a
> feature which is still under discussion.

Thanks for comments!

will fold it into next patch!