linux-kernel - Re: [lkp-robot] e5a305ac4a: WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_del_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170119004123.GB20827@yexl-desktop>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:41:23 +0800
From:   Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@...el.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
        Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "lkp@...org" <lkp@...org>
Subject: Re: [lkp-robot] e5a305ac4a:
 WARNING:at_lib/list_debug.c:#__list_del_entry_valid

On 01/18, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>From: lkp-robot-request@...ists.intel.com [mailto:lkp-robot-request@...ists.intel.com] On Behalf Of kernel test robot
>> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>> 
>> commit: e5a305ac4a5233e039586c97f4ea643a4c7dc484 ("Reimplement IDR
>> and IDA using the radix tree")
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgit.kernel
>> .org%2Fpub%2Fscm%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fnext%2Flinux-
>> next.git&data=02%7C01%7Cmawilcox%40microsoft.com%7C3b615320ff5c48f
>> efde708d43f40a5f9%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C6
>> 36202994282292096&sdata=vMGk%2FAoZeMkABynnuEIiKM07li%2FzdZlSMM
>> NmwNIGQ1s%3D&reserved=0 master
>
>1. I'm not entirely convinced that this is a reasonable commit to test.  Due to the way Andrew has merged a fix for this commit in a second commit, it's expected to be buggy.  Although I don't think it could cause this specific failure pattern.  Testing commit ffc87d11841ec68a44c57735ff4fada521ab5a27 would make more sense.
>
>2. Ignoring the mangling that outlook has done to that URL, it's pointing somewhere not very useful for a web browser to access: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/
>
>Pointing to https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/ would make more sense

Thanks for the suggestion, we'll improve it.

Thanks,
Xiaolong
>
>3. Thank you for reminding me that I need to send Andrew a complete replacement for that patch.
>