linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/17] HID: logitech-hidpp: make .probe usbhid capable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1701191155230.25515@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:56:04 +0100 (CET)
From:   Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To:     Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
cc:     Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
        Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>,
        Nestor Lopez Casado <nlopezcasad@...itech.com>,
        Olivier Gay <ogay@...itech.com>,
        Simon Wood <simon@...gewell.org>,
        linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/17] HID: logitech-hidpp: make .probe usbhid capable

On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:

> > The current custom solution for the G920 is not the best because
> > hid_hw_start() is not called at the end of the .probe().
> > It means that any configuration retrieved after the initial hid_hw_start
> > would not be exposed to user space without races.
> >
> > We can simply force hid_hw_start to just enable the transport layer by
> > not using a connect_mask. This way, we can have a common path between
> > USB, Unifying and Bluetooth devices.
> >
> > Tested with a G502 (plain USB), a T650 and many other unifying devices,
> > and the T651 over Bluetooth.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > index a5d37a4..f5889ff 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-logitech-hidpp.c
> > @@ -2813,6 +2813,17 @@ static int hidpp_probe(struct hid_device *hdev, const struct hid_device_id *id)
> >         if (!hidpp_validate_device(hdev))
> >                 return hid_hw_start(hdev, HID_CONNECT_DEFAULT);
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * HID++ needs to read incoming report while in .probe().
> > +        * However, this doesn't work for plain USB devices until the hdev
> > +        * status is set with HID_STAT_ADDED (device fully registered once
> > +        * with HID).
> > +        * So we ask for it to be reprobed later.
> > +        */
> > +       if (id->group != HID_GROUP_LOGITECH_DJ_DEVICE &&
> > +           !(hdev->status & HID_STAT_ADDED))
> 
> Looks like this test breaks the T651 (bluetooth) after all. I seem to
> have better success with:
>     if (id->bus == BUS_USB && !(hdev->status & HID_STAT_ADDED))
> 
> But that also means that the solution will not work if there is only
> one USB interface in the device :/

Benjamin,

do you want at least a subset of this patchset to be queued before you 
figure this out, or should I put the whole thing on hold? (not gone 
through it fully yet).

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs