linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCHv1 6/8] mmc: sdhci: Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3aeac9e4-d707-ffaf-181b-386ef98813ef@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:07:36 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...eaurora.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
        venkatg@...eaurora.org, pramod.gurav@...aro.org,
        jeremymc@...hat.com, git@...r.de
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCHv1 6/8] mmc: sdhci: Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag
 after platform_execute_tuning

Hi Adrian,

Thanks for reviewing.

On 1/19/2017 3:40 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 10/01/17 09:00, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Clear SDHCI_HS400_TUNING flag after platform_execute_tuning
>> so that platform_execute_tuning may use it if needed.
>
> Sorry for the slow reply.
>
> platform_execute_tuning() should not really exist because it doesn't do
> anything useful.
>
> If it is not too much trouble please consider just hooking
> ->execute_tuning() directly i.e.
>
> 	host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning = sdhci_msm_execute_tuning;
>
> Then you can use and clear the flag in sdhci_msm_execute_tuning().
Sure, this seems fine. I will try it and re-submit based on your above 
suggestion.

Regards
Ritesh


>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 6 ++++--
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> index 2390980..2658f89 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>> @@ -2114,7 +2114,6 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>>
>>  	hs400_tuning = host->flags & SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
>> -	host->flags &= ~SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
>>
>>  	if (host->tuning_mode == SDHCI_TUNING_MODE_1)
>>  		tuning_count = host->tuning_count;
>> @@ -2156,7 +2155,9 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>>
>>  	if (host->ops->platform_execute_tuning) {
>>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>> -		return host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
>> +		err = host->ops->platform_execute_tuning(host, opcode);
>> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>>  	}
>>
>>  	host->mmc->retune_period = tuning_count;
>> @@ -2167,6 +2168,7 @@ int sdhci_execute_tuning(struct mmc_host *mmc, u32 opcode)
>>
>>  	sdhci_end_tuning(host);
>>  out_unlock:
>> +	host->flags &= ~SDHCI_HS400_TUNING;
>>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>>
>>  	return err;
>>
>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project