[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484827882.2133.229.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:11:22 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: Allow configuration of pins from gpiolib
based drivers
On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 12:48 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> When a GPIO driver is backed by a pinctrl driver the GPIO driver
> sometimes needs to call the pinctrl driver to configure certain
> things,
> like whether the pin is used as input or output. In addition to this
> there are other configurations applicable to GPIOs such as setting
> debounce time of the GPIO.
>
> To support this we introduce a new function pinctrl_gpio_set_config()
> that can be used by gpiolib based driver to pass configuration
> requests
> to the backing pinctrl driver.
> + mutex_lock(&pctldev->mutex);
> + pin = gpio_to_pin(range, gpio);
> + ret = pinconf_set_config(pctldev, pin, configs,
> ARRAY_SIZE(configs));
> + mutex_unlock(&pctldev->mutex);
Does gpio_to_pin() require to be under lock?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists