[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1484827992.3140.9.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 07:13:12 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] tpm2: context save and restore space
managed sessions
On Thu, 2017-01-19 at 14:04 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 10:10:42AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Now that sessions are isolated, we can introduce a session_buf in
> > the tpm2 space to save and restore them. This allows us to have
> > many more sessions active simultaneously (up to
> > TPM_PT_MAX_SESSIONS). As part of this, we must intercept and
> > manually remove contexts for flushed sessions.
>
> Again I don't understand the interception part. Like with transient
> objects I just catch TPM_RC_HANDLE error and forget them in the save
> part.
it's for the global session tracking patch (see other email for
details)
> PS. Do you mind if I take part of the patch that encapsulates a
> single context save as of my patch that implements transient object
> swapping? It merely moves the code in there to a different location.
> Would just make the patch set cleaner. I would do this for v4 of the
> patch set.
Sure. Rebase should be able to do this easily for me.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists