linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] exynos-gsc: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 15:12:29 +0100
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [media] exynos-gsc: Fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable()
 error

Hi Javier,

On 2017-01-18 01:30, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Commit a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at
> ->remove()") changed the driver's .remove function logic to fist do
> a pm_runtime_get_sync() to make sure the device is powered before
> attempting to gate the gsc clock.
>
> But the commit also removed a pm_runtime_disable() call that leads
> to an unbalanced pm_runtime_enable() error if the driver is removed
> and re-probed:
>
> exynos-gsc 13e00000.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
> exynos-gsc 13e10000.video-scaler: Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!
>
> Fixes: a006c04e6218 ("[media] exynos-gsc: Fixup clock management at ->remove()")
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>

I must have mixed something during the rebase of the Ulf's patch, because
the original one kept pm_runtime_disable in the right place:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/317678.html

I'm really sorry.

Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>

> ---
>
>   drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
> index cbf75b6194b4..83272f10722d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos-gsc/gsc-core.c
> @@ -1118,6 +1118,7 @@ static int gsc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		clk_disable_unprepare(gsc->clock[i]);
>   
>   	pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>   
>   	dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s driver unloaded\n", pdev->name);
>   	return 0;

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland