linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/4] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi: Add support for custom PHY handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5ed16196-4666-d9af-cc5b-51d1a5cebec5@synopsys.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:20:25 +0000
From:   Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
To:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
CC:     <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 2/4] drm/bridge: dw-hdmi: Add support for custom
 PHY handling

Hi Neil,


On 18-01-2017 11:20, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> It's the idea we discussed with Laurent.
> Keeping the Synopsys PHY code inside the dw-hdmi driver would be simpler.
>
> But don't you think adding a proper "ops" structure apart from the plat_data
> should be necessary ?
>
> Neil
>

An "ops" structure seems fine by me :) We could have one for the
generic phy's (the ones that dw-hdmi already supports) and let
the developer specify other one if needed.

Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu