[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfB1nTK1Gx6Z_BrRP-zEfxrtcMoW2zOA1wAJMdUQt_tpg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:58:57 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@...ruber.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: pca9685: fix prescaler initialization
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 6:52 PM, Clemens Gruber
<clemens.gruber@...ruber.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:10:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> So, summarize, I prefer (in order of preference from high to low):
>> - enforce default prescaler value based on default period (it's just one
>> line to write a register)
>> - calculate default period based on actual prescaler value
>
> Let's go with this one. I'll spin up a v2 where I calculate the
> period_ns value from the current prescaler value in the probe function.
I'm fine with it. Thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists