[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b11c5cbe-6c63-e9dc-0313-e2dff3830951@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 18:24:59 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Liang Li <liang.z.li@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, amit.shah@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, cornelia.huck@...ibm.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, aarcange@...hat.com, dgilbert@...hat.com,
quintela@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 kernel 0/5] Extend virtio-balloon for fast
(de)inflating & fast live migration
> As long as the interface is similar, it seems to make
> sense for me - why invent a completely new device that
> looks very much like the old one?
The only reason would be that this feature could be used independently
of virtio-balloon. But this would of course only be the case, if
ballooning is strictly not wanted in a configuration, or the current
balloon driver gets replaced by an alternative solution.
I don't have any strong feelings about this, just wanted to double check.
Thanks,
David
>
> So this boils down to whether the speedup patches are merged.
>
>
>> --
>>
>> David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists