linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Provide a lightweight option for Virtual FC Hosts.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5880FE68.4010102@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 12:59:04 -0500
From:   Cathy Avery <cavery@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: scsi_transport_fc: Provide a lightweight option
 for Virtual FC Hosts.



On 01/19/2017 10:11 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 03:28:57PM -0500, Cathy Avery wrote:
>> The patch provides a means to offer a lightweight option to the
>> current FC transport class. The new option is selected by a
>> driver when it indicates it wants the lightweight
>> transport via fc_function_template.
> This need some really good documentation in the code and changelog
> what "lightweight" means.  It's a pretty horrible term, btw.

Thanks, I will work on better documentation and a better name.

Cathy