[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrHvYNOCfAjASEHz75fVcaqt5fptFaqWp5nVPFnHuHV1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 21:30:29 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.consulting>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mmc: pwrseq: add support for Marvell SD8787 chip
On 19 January 2017 at 21:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> writes:
>
>> Twisting my head around how this could be integrated smoothly into
>> pwrseq simple. No, I just can find a good way forward without messing
>> up pwrseq simple itself.
>>
>> So, for now I decided (once more :-), that let's keep this as separate driver!
>>
>> Perhaps, following device specific mmc pwrseq drivers will needs
>> something similar, but in such case we can look into that then.
>> Thinking about cw1200 for example.
>>
>> Let's get Rob's ack for the DT bindings, seems almost there, then I
>> will queue this.
>
> Just to confirm, you will take the whole set (including the bindings
> patch)?
Yes, correct.
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists