linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] iio: light: acpi-als: Properly enable on ASUS Zenbooks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cf14c25f-b1ef-0c45-167d-c47823333578@denx.de>
Date:   Thu, 19 Jan 2017 23:04:51 +0100
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     Josef Gajdusek <atx@....name>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, maitysanchayan@...il.com,
        gregor.boirie@...rot.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, marxin.liska@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: light: acpi-als: Properly enable on ASUS Zenbooks

On 01/19/2017 08:01 PM, Josef Gajdusek wrote:
> ASUS Zenbooks need several special ACPI calls to enable the ALS peripheral.
> Otherwise, reads just return 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Gajdusek <atx@....name>

Changelog is missing ...

> ---
>  drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
> index f0b47c5..43417c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/acpi-als.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>  #include <linux/iio/buffer.h>
> @@ -39,6 +40,9 @@
>  #define ACPI_ALS_DEVICE_NAME		"acpi-als"
>  #define ACPI_ALS_NOTIFY_ILLUMINANCE	0x80
>  
> +#define ACPI_ALS_ASUS_TALS		"\\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC0.TALS"
> +#define ACPI_ALS_ASUS_ALSC		"\\_SB.ATKD.ALSC"
> +
>  ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi-als");
>  
>  /*
> @@ -170,6 +174,46 @@ static int acpi_als_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
>  	return IIO_VAL_INT;
>  }
>  
> +static int acpi_als_quirk_asus_zenbook_add(struct acpi_als *als)
> +{
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(NULL, ACPI_ALS_ASUS_TALS, 1);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Error enabling ALS by %s",
> +				ACPI_ALS_ASUS_TALS));
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +	status = acpi_execute_simple_method(NULL, ACPI_ALS_ASUS_ALSC, 1);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status, "Error enabling ALS by %s",
> +				ACPI_ALS_ASUS_ALSC));

This doesn't unwind the previous operation. If ALSC fails, won't the
TALS still be enabled ?

> +		return -EIO;

Isn't there some way to extract error code from the $status and
propagating it instead of hard-coding EIO here ?

> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +struct quirk_entry {
> +	int (*add)(struct acpi_als *als);
> +};
> +
> +static struct quirk_entry acpi_als_quirk_asus_zenbook = {
> +	.add = acpi_als_quirk_asus_zenbook_add
> +};
> +
> +static const struct dmi_system_id acpi_als_quirks[] = {
> +	{
> +		.ident = "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. UX",
> +		.matches = {
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
> +			DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "UX"),

I'm no expert on DMI, but is this unique enough ?

> +		},
> +		.driver_data = &acpi_als_quirk_asus_zenbook,
> +	},
> +	{},
> +};
> +
>  static const struct iio_info acpi_als_info = {
>  	.driver_module		= THIS_MODULE,
>  	.read_raw		= acpi_als_read_raw,
> @@ -180,6 +224,9 @@ static int acpi_als_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	struct acpi_als *als;
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
>  	struct iio_buffer *buffer;
> +	const struct dmi_system_id *dmiid;
> +	struct quirk_entry *quirk;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&device->dev, sizeof(*als));
>  	if (!indio_dev)
> @@ -191,6 +238,19 @@ static int acpi_als_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>  	als->device = device;
>  	mutex_init(&als->lock);
>  
> +	dmiid = dmi_first_match(acpi_als_quirks);
> +	if (dmiid) {
> +		dev_dbg(&device->dev, "Detected quirk for %s\n", dmiid->ident);
> +		quirk = dmiid->driver_data;

What happens if some entry has quirk == NULL ? :)

> +		ret = quirk->add(als);

Who will disable the ALS if you rmmod this driver ? Hint: noone, fix it.

btw something tells me that maybe, just maybe, we should use pm_runtime
to enable and disable the ALS on demand instead of enabling it and
keeping it enabled for the entire duration this driver is in the kernel.
This will reduce the power consumption a little.

> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(&device->dev,
> +				"Executing quirk for %s failed - %d",
> +				dmiid->ident, ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	indio_dev->name = ACPI_ALS_DEVICE_NAME;
>  	indio_dev->dev.parent = &device->dev;
>  	indio_dev->info = &acpi_als_info;
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut