[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y3y6k7pg.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 17:26:03 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@...vell.com>,
Joe Zhou <shjzhou@...vell.com>,
Jon Pannell <jpannell@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for ethernet switch 88E6341
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com> writes:
> +static bool mv88e6xxx_6341_family(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return chip->info->family == MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341;
> +}
I don't want to see these erronous family checks anymore, but I cannot
blame you for adding it since not all the code is moved to ops yet ;)
> MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6165, /* 6123 6161 6165 */
> MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6185, /* 6108 6121 6122 6131 6152 6155 6182 6185 */
> MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6320, /* 6320 6321 */
> + MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341, /* 6141 6341 */
Maybe I missed it, Andrew, can you confirm that 6341 is a proper Marvell
family of switch chips?
> MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6351, /* 6171 6175 6350 6351 */
> MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6352, /* 6172 6176 6240 6352 */
> MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6390, /* 6190 6190X 6191 6290 6390 6390X */
Otherwise the patch looks good.
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists