lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:29:07 +0530
From:   Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...eaurora.org>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc:     Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, georgi.djakov@...aro.org,
        asutoshd@...eaurora.org, stummala@...eaurora.org,
        venkatg@...eaurora.org, pramod.gurav@...aro.org,
        jeremymc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC 1/3] mmc: sdhci: Add platform_dumpregs callback
 support to sdhci_ops.


On 1/19/2017 4:13 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 18/01/17 09:57, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>> Hi Shawn,
>>
>> On 1/10/2017 2:45 PM, Shawn Lin wrote:
>>> On 2017/1/10 14:41, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
>>>> From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@...eaurora.org>
>>>>
>>>> Add new host operation ->platform_dumpregs to provide a
>>>> mechanism through which host drivers can dump platform
>>>> specific registers in addition to SDHC registers
>>>> during error conditions.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Although we have been preventing from adding new callback
>>> for sdhci core, this one makes sense as there are more and more
>>> vendor registers outside the scope of SDHCI spec.
>
> We are not prevented from adding new callbacks, but they have to represent
> logical functions not quirks.
>
> This patch seems fine to me except the name "platform_dumpregs" because
I took platform prefix similar to platform_execute_tuning.


> "platform" doesn't mean "platform" here.  Just plain "dumpregs" is better.
Sure, I will only keep "dumpregs" in next revision.

>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ